Short Moodle courses to be delivered as accredited faculty development programs (15-25 hours each), licensed to engineering/arts colleges or delivered in-person with Moodle as the resource backbone.

Question Paper Design with Bloom's Taxonomy

A 15-hour FDP for engineering and arts faculty on designing internal and external question papers calibrated to Bloom's cognitive levels and CO mapping.

📋 Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, the learner will be able to:

  1. Classify a bank of existing exam questions by Bloom cognitive level and CO linkage for an assigned subject [Analyze]
  2. Design a question paper blueprint with target Bloom-level distribution, difficulty mix and CO coverage table [Create]
  3. Construct a complete internal assessment paper with marks, rubrics and CO-Bloom annotation per question [Create]
  4. Analyze sample question papers to detect ambiguity, cultural bias, language issues and over-clustering at Remember/Understand [Analyze]
  5. Evaluate a peer faculty member's question paper against blueprint, CO mapping and moderation criteria [Evaluate]
  6. Revise a flagged question paper based on moderator feedback and produce an audit-ready final version with mapping table [Create]

📚 Chapters

  1. Bloom's Revised Cognitive Levels: Remember to Create
  2. Mapping Questions to COs and Bloom Levels
  3. Difficulty Distribution: Easy, Medium and Hard
  4. Question Types Appropriate to Each Cognitive Level
  5. Marking Schemes and Analytic Rubrics
  6. Internal vs External Assessment Paper Design
  7. Question Paper Template with CO-Mapping Table
  8. Avoiding Common Pitfalls: Ambiguity, Language and Bias
  9. Sample Papers Across Bloom Levels
  10. Validation by External Moderators and Question Paper Audit

TutorDA LMS

NBA SAR Preparation for Engineering Departments

A 25-hour FDP for engineering faculty on preparing Tier-I/II NBA Self Assessment Reports with attainment computation and continuous improvement evidence.

📋 Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, the learner will be able to:

  1. Articulate department Vision, Mission, PEOs and POs with consistent linkage to institutional Vision and Mission [Create]
  2. Construct CO-PO attainment tables for an assigned subject using the prescribed NBA computation methodology [Apply]
  3. Compile faculty information, research output and student outcome sections with verifiable supporting documents [Create]
  4. Analyze a sample SAR for Tier-I/II compliance gaps in curriculum articulation and continuous improvement evidence [Analyze]
  5. Evaluate laboratory and infrastructure documentation against NBA criteria and propose remediation actions [Evaluate]
  6. Draft Action-Taken Reports demonstrating closed-loop continuous improvement using two cycles of attainment data [Create]

📚 Chapters

  1. NBA Accreditation Overview: Tier-I and Tier-II
  2. Self Assessment Report (SAR) Structure and Sections
  3. Vision, Mission, PEO and PO Articulation
  4. Curriculum Design and Articulation with POs
  5. CO-PO Attainment Computation Methodology
  6. Faculty Information, Research and Student Outcomes
  7. Laboratory, Infrastructure and Resource Documentation
  8. Continuous Improvement Evidence and Action-Taken Reports
  9. Pre-Visit Submission and Post-Visit Responses
  10. Common SAR Weaknesses and Reviewer Observations

TutorDA LMS

NAAC Documentation Essentials for Math Departments

A 20-hour FDP for arts and science faculty (with focus on math departments) on preparing department-level NAAC documentation, SSR and AQAR submissions.

📋 Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, the learner will be able to:

  1. Map departmental data points to the seven NAAC criteria and identify gaps in current departmental records [Analyze]
  2. Compute quantitative NAAC metrics such as student-teacher ratio and research output indices with verifiable evidence trails [Apply]
  3. Compile criterion-wise qualitative evidence files with proper indexing, naming conventions and digital storage hierarchy [Create]
  4. Draft Best Practice and Institutional Distinctiveness write-ups for a math department within NAAC word limits [Create]
  5. Evaluate a sample SSR submission and predict reviewer questions and likely audit findings [Evaluate]
  6. Produce a departmental AQAR section and rehearse a peer-team-visit presentation [Create]

📚 Chapters

  1. NAAC Framework and Assessment & Accreditation Cycles
  2. SSR Structure and the Seven Criteria
  3. Department-Level Data Points (Criteria-Wise)
  4. Quantitative Metrics: Calculation and Verification
  5. Qualitative Evidence Preparation and Storage
  6. Best Practices and Institutional Distinctiveness Write-Ups
  7. AQAR Annual Reporting Workflow
  8. Peer Team Visit Preparation and Departmental Presentations
  9. Common Audit Findings and Remediation Strategies
  10. Mock SSR Drafting Workshop

TutorDA LMS

AI Tools for Math Faculty (ChatGPT, Wolfram, GeoGebra)

A 20-hour FDP for math faculty on integrating AI and computational tools into teaching, assessment and lesson planning, with ethical guidelines.

📋 Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, the learner will be able to:

  1. Apply structured prompt engineering techniques to elicit accurate solutions and worked examples for university-level math problems [Apply]
  2. Generate a draft question paper with AI assistance and refine it through iterative prompt tuning and faculty review [Create]
  3. Verify symbolic and numerical results using Wolfram Alpha or Mathematica before publishing answer keys to students [Apply]
  4. Construct interactive GeoGebra applets for embedding into Moodle pages to teach calculus or coordinate geometry [Create]
  5. Evaluate AI-generated solutions for mathematical correctness, pedagogical suitability and signs of hallucination [Evaluate]
  6. Formulate a department-level ethical use policy covering AI in lesson preparation, assessment and plagiarism detection [Create]

📚 Chapters

  1. Prompt Engineering for Mathematical Problems
  2. ChatGPT for Question Paper Drafting and Solution Hints
  3. Wolfram Alpha for Symbolic Computation and Verification
  4. GeoGebra for Interactive Geometry and Calculus
  5. Mathematica and Maple for Advanced Symbolic Work
  6. AI-Assisted Assessment and Item Generation
  7. Plagiarism and AI-Generated Content Detection
  8. Ethical Use Guidelines and Institutional Policy
  9. Moodle Integration: Embedded Widgets, Links and Calculator Activities
  10. Sample Lesson Plans Using AI Tools

TutorDA LMS

LaTeX for Academic Writing and Question Paper Setting

A 20-hour FDP for engineering and arts faculty on producing professional academic documents, presentations and university question papers using LaTeX.

📋 Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, the learner will be able to:

  1. Compose a structured LaTeX document with sectioning, cross-referencing and BibTeX-managed bibliography for a research paper draft [Apply]
  2. Typeset complex mathematical content using align, cases, matrix and tikz environments suitable for engineering coursework [Apply]
  3. Construct a university-style question paper using the exam class with marks, CO tags and Bloom-level annotations [Create]
  4. Design a Beamer presentation with institutional branding for a conference or classroom lecture [Create]
  5. Implement reproducible random question generation in LaTeX so multiple paper variants share an answer key [Create]
  6. Evaluate and adapt journal-supplied LaTeX templates to comply with submission guidelines for a target journal [Evaluate]

📚 Chapters

  1. LaTeX Installation and IDEs (Overleaf, TeXstudio, VS Code)
  2. Document Structure, Sectioning and Cross-Referencing
  3. Math Mode and Equation Environments
  4. Tables, Figures and Floats
  5. Bibliography Management with BibTeX and BibLaTeX
  6. Beamer for Academic Presentations
  7. Question Paper Class Files and University Templates
  8. The exam Class for University Question Papers
  9. Reproducible Random Question Generation in LaTeX
  10. Templates for Journal Submissions and Theses

TutorDA LMS

Designing Digital Assessments in Moodle

A 25-hour hands-on FDP for engineering and arts faculty on building rigorous, secure and analytics-driven digital assessments using Moodle.

📋 Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, the learner will be able to:

  1. Build a tagged Moodle question bank with categories aligned to course units and Bloom levels for an assigned subject [Create]
  2. Author Calculated and Formula questions with randomized variables and tolerance settings for STEM topics [Create]
  3. Configure a secure Moodle quiz with Safe Exam Browser, time limits, question shuffling and password protection [Apply]
  4. Design analytic rubrics in Moodle for Essay-type questions and grade a sample submission batch [Apply]
  5. Analyze quiz statistics including item difficulty index and discrimination index to flag defective items [Analyze]
  6. Evaluate the validity of a deployed Moodle quiz and export gradebook reports formatted for internal assessment records [Evaluate]

📚 Chapters

  1. Moodle Question Types Overview
  2. Building Question Banks: Categories, Tags and Sharing
  3. MCQ Writing Best Practices Aligned to Bloom's Taxonomy
  4. Calculated and Formula Questions for STEM
  5. Essay Questions and Rubric-Based Grading
  6. Adaptive Quizzes and Lesson Activities
  7. Quiz Security: Safe Exam Browser, Time Limits and Shuffling
  8. Gradebook Setup, Categories and Weighting
  9. Question Analysis, Item Difficulty and Discrimination Index
  10. Reporting and Export for Internal Assessment Records

TutorDA LMS

Outcome-Based Education and CO-PO Mapping

A 20-hour FDP for engineering and arts faculty on designing courses around measurable outcomes and producing audit-ready CO-PO documentation.

📋 Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, the learner will be able to:

  1. Rewrite an existing course's vague learning objectives into 5-6 measurable Course Outcomes using Bloom's revised taxonomy verbs [Apply]
  2. Construct a complete CO-PO-PSO mapping matrix with written justifications for each non-zero cell of an assigned subject [Create]
  3. Compute Level 1/2/3 direct and indirect CO attainment from a real internal assessment dataset using a standard rubric [Apply]
  4. Analyze a peer faculty member's CO-PO matrix and identify gaps, over-mapping and missing PSO linkages [Analyze]
  5. Evaluate sample articulation matrices against NAAC and NBA accreditation expectations for compliance [Evaluate]
  6. Draft a course-end attainment report with CQI action items suitable for departmental audit submission [Create]

📚 Chapters

  1. OBE Philosophy, Origin and Global Adoption
  2. Bloom's Revised Taxonomy and Cognitive Levels
  3. Writing Measurable Course Outcomes (COs)
  4. Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
  5. CO-PO Mapping Matrices and Justification
  6. Levels of Attainment (Levels 1, 2 and 3)
  7. Direct vs Indirect Attainment Methods
  8. Course Articulation Matrix Construction
  9. Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Loop
  10. Audit-Ready CO-PO Documentation and Templates

TutorDA LMS